NOW READ OUR ARTICLES IN 40 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES.
HOME PAGE All ADVERTISING OPTIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS - Print Edition, News Bulletin Service PRODUCTS - Special Publications SEARCHABLE ARCHIVES Free Trial Subscription


Vol. 14, No. 2 Week of January 11, 2009
Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry

Proponent touts coal-to-liquids plant

Click here to read the PDF version of this story.

Print this story | Email it to an associate.

The multibillion dollar price tag on a coal-to-liquids plant might seem expensive but a project proponent says the benefits could outweigh the cost.

Jim Dodson, executive director of the Fairbanks Economic Development Corp., addressed business people in early January at the Greater Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce luncheon.

He asked them to look beyond the estimated $2 billion to $6 billion price tag.

“It brings tremendous opportunity to Alaska, not just Interior Alaska, but really, all of Alaska,” Dodson said.

The Fairbanks Economic Development Corp. spent $550,000 in 2008 on a feasibility study developed by Toronto-based consultant Hatch. Released in November, the study indicated that a coal-to-liquids plant using Fischer-Tropsch and gasification technology could be economically feasible in Alaska’s Interior, providing that oil prices remain high and that investors don’t expect a high rate of return.

Fuel at $2 gallon

Ideally, a coal-to-liquids plant could supply Fairbanks with fuel on par with $2 per gallon about the same price customers pay when oil is going at $88 per barrel, Dodson said. At that level, investors in such a plant could expect a 5-7 percent rate of return, not likely high enough to attract big money, he said.

Dodson and others, including borough Mayor Jim Whitaker, have touted the plant as a solution for Fairbanks’ long-term economic viability. Proponents say the plant could ease the region’s dependence on oil by processing coal into liquid fuels, and help reining in energy costs.

At the same time, the plant could offset some air quality concerns as liquid fuels are generated without the emissions released by oil-fired refineries, proponents say.

Most of all, the coal-to-liquids plant could produce synthetic fuels for the U.S. Air Force, which in turn could anchor the military’s future in Interior Alaska, Dodson said.

He said FEDC has discussed terms with and is waiting to start negotiating with the U.S. Air Force for a contract to study further a coal-to-liquids plant, possibly located near Eielson Air Force Base. The air force has $10 million available to advance those studies, he said.

—The Associated Press



Did you find this article interesting?
Tweet it
TwitThis
Digg it
Digg

Submit it to another favorite Social Site or Article Directory.

del.icio.us Facebook Furl Mixx NewsVine Reddit StumbleUpon YahooMyWeb Google LinkedIn Live MySpace Sphinn Technorati Yahoo! Buzz
Email it to an associate.
Print this story





Mouseover to stop
clickable ads





























































Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistrubuted.

Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
circulation@PetroleumNews.com --- http://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2011 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.