HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PAY HERE

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
March 2009

Vol. 14, No. 11 Week of March 15, 2009

Decision on Shell exploration withdrawn

Alan Bailey

Petroleum News

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has withdrawn its Nov. 20 decision by a panel of three judges that upheld appeals by the North Slope Borough, the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission and several environmental organizations against U.S. Minerals Management Service approval of Shell’s Beaufort Sea exploration plan.

“The opinion vacated and withdrawn will be replaced by a new opinion,” the court said in an order issued March 6. The court did not indicate when the new opinion would be issued.

As a consequence of the November court decision Shell deferred its planned 2009 Beaufort Sea exploration drilling program. The company also filed a petition for a rehearing of the case by the full court.

But the court now says that its decision to vacate the November decision renders moot the Shell rehearing petition and any other motions that relate to that petition.

Majority decision

In the November decision a majority of the judges on the court panel said that MMS had not conducted an adequate environmental evaluation of Shell’s Beaufort Sea exploration plan and that the agency must prepare a revised environmental assessment. Among its findings the court said that MMS had not sufficiently analyzed the impact of drilling noise on bowhead whale migration patterns and, hence, the impact on subsistence whale hunting.

However, one judge dissented from the opinion, saying that MMS had thoroughly analyzed the potential impacts of Shell’s Beaufort Sea program and commenting that it was not appropriate for the court to overrule MMS expertise regarding the interpretation of research results pertaining to the potential impacts of exploration activities on bowhead whales.

But no one seems clear why the court has now withdrawn its November opinion.

“It’s difficult to know what the intent of this decision could mean,” Shell spokesman Curtis Smith told Petroleum News March 9. “Obviously, we disagreed with the court’s original ruling that vacated MMS’s approval of our plan of exploration. While we await the new opinion from the court, we will continue to engage with the communities on the North Slope about our exploration plans.”

Smith said that Shell recognizes that a key ingredient of the company’s success involves finding common ground with the people of Alaska to develop offshore resources for everyone’s benefit.






Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469
[email protected] --- https://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)Š1999-2019 All rights reserved. The content of this article and website may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law.