Grasping Alberta oil sands nettles Industry, researchers turn more attention to cutting carbon dioxide emissions, use of natural gas for resource development By Gary Park For Petroleum News
Two of the bugbears to the continued growth of Alberta’s oil sands — carbon dioxide emissions and heavy natural gas consumption — have been getting a lively airing this year.
The head of the Alberta government’s research arm issued a blunt warning that expansion could be slowed unless the industry voluntarily finds a way to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Separately, there is an industry-led push to find less wasteful ways than burning natural gas to convert the sticky bitumen of northern Alberta into synthetic crude.
These concerns coincide with a new study by independent consulting firm Purvin & Gertz that the economics surrounding the oil sands are strong enough to support continued growth, although the authors say that expansion is unlikely to match the C$100 billion worth of projects currently on the table.
Alberta Research Council President John McDougal said the environmental challenges could be as much of an obstacle to the sector as the higher-profile labor shortages.
“Unless we deal with (the output of CO2) environmental pressures will accumulate and gather that will at best slow the pace of development and at worst stop it,” he told a conference of investors.
“It’s an issue that will have to be addressed.” Companies can address CO2 emissions He said oil sands companies can take steps of their own to curb emissions — a path he said they would be wise to follow before federal policy is imposed.
“Rhetoric in some political circles (prior to the Jan. 23 federal election) suggested declaring CO2 as a toxic substance as a way to deal with Kyoto (commitments),” McDougall said. “That’s shallow thinking.”
Regardless, he said the output of CO2 is already high as the industry embarks on a possible C$100 billion of capital investment in the oil sands.
He said surface mining operations spew about 40 kilograms (88 pounds) of CO2 per barrel of bitumen produced; thermal projects, exploiting more deeply buried bitumen, yield 65-80 kilograms of CO2 per barrel of oil; and upgraders produce 75-90 kilograms per barrel of bitumen processed into synthetic crude.
Without measures to convert CO2 into a useable product or technological advances that lower the energy intensity going into oil sands production, the oil sands sector could pump 145 metric tons of CO2 annually into the atmosphere, more than the entire province of Alberta produced in 1990.
“And that’s likely an underestimate,” McDougall said. Council working on technologies He noted that the not-for-profit Alberta Research Council, with 500 scientists, engineers and business managers on staff, is working on technologies that can be spun off to the private sector.
One solution is the capture and transport of CO2 by pipeline to conventional oil producers who use the gas to replenish reservoir pressures in aging oil fields and enhance oil recovery before sequestering the CO2 underground.
Karen Madro, who is managing plans by Shell Canada to hike output from its Peace River project from 10,000 barrels per day to 100,000 bpd, said her company views the need to ensure that oil sands development is environmentally acceptable as “absolutely critical.”
Measures being adopted should lower greenhouse gas emissions at Peace River by 50 percent or more, while efforts are under way to lower CO2 waste at Shell’s existing Athabasca project, where output is expected to grow from 155,000 bpd to 500,000 bpd.
To advance CO2 capture and storage, the Alberta government has signaled it is ready to establish a C$1.5 billion pipeline network in the province, but is currently wrestling with ways to share costs among industry and the Canadian and Alberta governments.
Otherwise, the cost would exceed any profit made from selling CO2 to companies that might use the gas in enhanced oil recovery projects, said Rick Hyndman, climate change policy advisor for the Canadian Association of Petroleum producers.
But companies are enthusiastic about the idea as one way to avoid a C$15 per metric ton CO2 charge that could be imposed under Kyoto.
Mondher Benhassine, a senior advisor at Natural Resources Canada, said sequestering CO2 could lead to a “rebirth of conventional oil in Canada as well as provide some greenhouse gas mitigation and address the climate change issue.”
Other hopes are pinned on projects such as the Heartland Upgrader under construction near Edmonton which plans to deploy improved, simplified technology to lower emissions by two-thirds and the Whitesands project by Petrobank Energy and Resources, which will come on stream in May with a pilot project that involves pumping air underground to fuel a fire that will burn heavier oil particles, thinning the remaining oil by underground combustion.
Also being tested are ways to inject solvents into the bitumen reservoir, helping to thin the deposits and force them to the surface.
It’s all part of the strides being made to ensure that the oil sands can offset the decline of conventional gas supplies and take advantage of the otherwise low-risk bitumen source, said Larry Boisvert, a petroleum engineering instructor at the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology. Oil price an important factor The urgent need to make advances was reflected last year in a warning issued by Bob Dunbar, former head of the Canadian Energy Research Institute and now a consultant, who said that so long as oil remains around US$65 a barrel oil sands producers will remain at ease.
“But if you think it could drop to $30-$35, or even to $40, then you are going to have second thoughts about proceeding with an investment,” he said.
Like many experts, Dunbar said it is not realistic to believe that all of the announced projects will proceed.
However, the 450-page Purvin & Gertz study said new projects could triple the supply of bitumen and synthetic crude beyond 3 million bpd within 10 years and are not likely to be restrained by reserves or access to markets.
The authors concluded that upgrading economics, based on light/heavy crude price differentials, should not deter the expansion of new capacity, although price volatility is unlikely to ease.
Study advisor Tim Wise said the development of new markets is essential to reduce the wide price differential between light and heavy crude, giving added weight to the push to add China, Japan, South Korea and California to the traditional outlets in the U.S. Midwest.
Study director Steven Kelley said producers should also be working to diversify their crude types to improve integration between producers and refiners.
|