NOW READ OUR ARTICLES IN 40 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES.
HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PETROLEUM NEWS BAKKEN MINING NEWS

SEARCH our ARCHIVE of over 14,000 articles
Vol. 15, No. 30 Week of July 25, 2010
Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry

State objects to polar bear cost estimate

The State of Alaska has objected to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s estimate of $669,000 as the total cost over a 29-year period of the critical habitat designation for the polar bear. The critical habitat designation followed the 2008 listing of the animals as threatened under the Endangered Species Act — the ESA requires an assessment of the economic ramifications of the critical habitat designation.

Fish and Wildlife based its cost estimate on the assumption that the designation would have little impact beyond protections already in place for the bears under the terms of the Marine Mammals Protection Act: The main economic impact of the critical habitat designation would be the cost of additional government consultations, Fish and Wildlife said.

An independent review commissioned by the State of Alaska and Arctic Slope Regional Corp. has concluded that “potential impacts may be in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars in just the next 15 years,” Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell said in a July 9 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

The review report says that costs would result from delays in the initiation or expansion of oil and gas exploration projects; reductions in oil production; and restrictions on construction projects, Parnell said in a July 9 press release announcing the state’s objections to the Fish and Wildlife cost estimate.

The state is also questioning whether the critical habitat designation will in fact benefit polar bears, given that Fish and Wildlife has said that the designation will not result in additional conservation measures, Parnell said.

In late 2009 the state filed suit in federal court to have the polar bear listing rejected. That case has not yet been resolved.

—Alan Bailey



Did you find this article interesting?
Tweet it
TwitThis
Digg it
Digg
Print this story | Email it to an associate.

Click here to subscribe to Petroleum News for as low as $69 per year.


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
circulation@PetroleumNews.com --- http://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.