NOW READ OUR ARTICLES IN 40 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES.
HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PETROLEUM NEWS BAKKEN MINING NEWS

SEARCH our ARCHIVE of over 14,000 articles
Vol. 16, No. 22 Week of May 29, 2011
Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry

Tried-and-true options: Canada’s Harper mostly counts on veterans

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said on election night May 2 that Canadians don’t like surprises. He hasn’t pulled any.

He also promised “strong, stable” government if voters gave his Conservative party a majority win. If that means sticking with tested performers, he’s delivered.

In naming a cabinet that was little changed from its pre-election makeup, Harper showed he will rely heavily on proven veterans to guide Canada through the next four years and keep his government on track.

For the complex energy industry, which overlaps several departments, it will take time to decide who wields the greatest influence within cabinet and what priorities Harper has set beyond his expressed desire to build an “energy superpower” from Canada’s extensive oil and natural gas resources.

Greg Stringham, vice president of marketing and oil sands at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, hopes the Harper government will use its newly won control over the House of Commons to demonstrate that Canada already has strong environmental standards in place for oil sands development and is prepared to reduce red tape to gain the confidence of international investors.

Gateway an initial test

The initial test of Harper’s “superpower” goal will the government’s handling of Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline project to open export routes to Asia for oil sands crude, freeing the resource from the confines of an economically and environmentally uncertain United States market.

That brings into play the ministers of natural resources, environment, aboriginal affairs and northern development (previously Indian Affairs and northern development), industry and foreign affairs.

For natural resources, Harper has named Joe Oliver, a political rookie, as his fourth holder of the office in five year.

Oliver, who turns 71 this year, brings a wealth of other experience to the table, including stints as an investment banker at three brokerage firms and head of both the Ontario Securities Commission and the Investment Dealers Association of Canada.

His understanding of the financial markets was welcomed by CAPP President David Collyer, who said an investment perspective on the industry’s ability to attract capital is “pretty fundamental.”

Collyer also suggested that Oliver’s experience on what “makes an effective regulatory system” will be beneficial.

In a brief comment, Oliver said that because he has “raised capital for companies and governments in Canada and internationally, many of them located in Ontario, Quebec and Alberta, I think I have a background that may be relevant.”

As well, he said the Harper government is committed to “responsible exploitation” of Canada’s natural resources, notably the oil sands sector.

Oliver’s agenda also includes negotiating a fiscal agreement with partners in the Mackenzie Gas Project, taking a leading role in talks with the provincial governments on drafting a national energy policy and setting a course for hydro, nuclear and renewable energy.

GHG emissions to be curbed

Retained as environment minister, Peter Kent was quick to promise federal regulations to curb greenhouse gas emissions in the oil sands and coal-fired electricity sectors.

But he was emphatic that Canada — in the absence of any sign of action in the United States — will not introduce a carbon tax or cap-and-trade system in the next few years.

“It’s been off the table for some time now,” he said. “We just don’t believe it’s practical or advisable.”

Instead, Canada will introduce “flexible guidelines” for Canada’s largest polluting industries, allowing individual sectors to meet their targets through measures such as technological improvements and carbon capture and storage, Kent said.

He said there is a “reasonable” chance Canada can achieve its pledge to reduce GHGs by 17 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, matching a target set by the Obama administration.

Kent said bitumen producers will be given a period of grace rather than face a “hard line of sudden conversion.”

That seemed consistent with Collyer’s view that the government should avoid imposing absolute emission reductions in the near term at a time when the oil sands sector is ramping up its crude output.

But Kent said all polluters, including oil sands operations, “will be expected to reduce GHGs.”

Project opposition

Oliver, Kent and John Duncan, reappointed as aboriginal affairs and northern development minister, will all have roles to play in Northern Gateway along with Kinder Morgan’s plans to increase its crude shipments out of Vancouver and three possible LNG export ventures.

Those projects face daunting opposition from First Nations and environmentalists to overland pipelines and tanker traffic off the British Columbia coast.

Roger Gibbins, chief executive officer of the independent Canada West Foundation, said the answer lies in a full public discussion over whether community groups should be able to block the flow of oil and gas out of British Columbia ports when the traditional U.S. export market is “in trouble.”

On that issue, Harper has been clear: “We’re not going to create artificial bans on the West Coast that don’t exist in other parts of the country.”

To varying degrees, the trio of ministers — Oliver, Kent and Duncan — will have to deal with an increasingly powerful and unbending aboriginal leadership over the development of oil and gas in northern Canada and emerging divisions within those communities between those who welcome the economic benefits of resource exploitation and those who fear the potential harm to traditional lifestyles.

Foreign ownership

Christian Paradis, who has been moved from the natural resources portfolio to industry, will have the final say over whether specific investments by state-owned foreign enterprises in the resource sector will meet Canada’s standard of corporate governance, yield a net economic benefit to the country and pass a national security test.

The current focus is on PetroChina’s proposed US$5.4 billion acquisition of a 50 percent stake in Encana natural gas assets in British Columbia and Alberta — a deal that has twice faced regulatory delays since being announced in February.

Leo de Bever, chief executive officer of the Alberta Investment Management Corp., which manages the province’s C$70 billion of public sector funds, said more public debate is needed about foreign investment, given that resources are “part of the national wealth” and as such Canada should “retain some semblance of control over economic activity.”

Also in the Canadian government’s energy picture is John Baird, the new foreign affairs minister and a trusted lieutenant of Harper.

Known for his forthright manner, he will need to mix that with diplomacy in countering international criticism of Canada’s oil sands record and in presenting its case for sovereignty over Arctic territory and resource development.

—Gary Park



Did you find this article interesting?
Tweet it
TwitThis
Digg it
Digg
Print this story | Email it to an associate.

Click here to subscribe to Petroleum News for as low as $69 per year.


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
circulation@PetroleumNews.com --- http://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.




Alberta’s oil sands cash cow

Feeding off a recovery in crude oil demand and prices, the Alberta oil sands could attract spending of more than C$2 trillion on new projects over the 2010-35 period — C$1.85 trillion in operation, maintenance and sustaining capital and C$253 billion in initial strategic capital for construction — says the Canadian Energy Research Institute.

The impact could contribute C$2.11 trillion to Canada’s gross domestic product and C$521 billion to the United States GDP, although CERI said these figures should not be seen as the total economic contribution of the oil sands.

The investment would boost related employment in Canada (direct, indirect and induced) to 905,000 jobs in 2035 from 75,000 in 2011 and in the U.S. to 465,000 jobs from 21,000.

CERI Chief Executive Officer Peter Howard said the post-recession revival of projects and the introduction of new ventures has resulted in production targets of 2.1 million barrels per day by 2015 (up 400,000 bpd from current output), 4.8 million bpd in 2030 and 4.9 million bpd by 2035.

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers is about to revise its own forecast last spring of 3.5 million bpd, or 81 percent of Canada’s total crude production, by 2025.

CERI predicts in-situ bitumen production will match mined production by 2025 and rise to 2.8 million bpd or 57 percent by 2035.

By 2035, natural gas requirements for oil sands operations are expected to reach 4.3 billion cubic feet per day — double today’s consumption — although new technology and efficiency improvements will lower per-barrel gas needs.

CERI forecasts greenhouse gas emissions will rise to 89 million metric tons per year by 2035.

Under the scenario, the Canadian government will collect C$311 billion in taxes from new oil sands projects over the next 25 years, while Alberta will receive C$105 billion in taxes and C$350 billion in oil sands royalties. Annual royalties in Alberta are targeted at C$10.3 billion in 2023 and C$36 billion in 2035.

—Gary Park