NOW READ OUR ARTICLES IN 40 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES.
HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PETROLEUM NEWS BAKKEN MINING NEWS

SEARCH our ARCHIVE of over 14,000 articles
Vol. 12, No. 49 Week of December 09, 2007
Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry

TransCanada stepping in to jump-start Mackenzie line?

According to the Financial Post, TransCanada Corp. appears to be stepping into the jump-start the stalled Mackenzie natural gas pipeline.

On Dec. 5 the newspaper reported that a deal restructuring the stalled Mackenzie line “appears to be close at hand, and would involve TransCanada Corp. and the Aboriginal Pipeline Group taking control away from a consortium of oil companies led by Imperial Oil Ltd., sources said yesterday.”

After six months in limbo because of increasing costs to build the line, “it appears the producers are prepared to step aside and let TransCanada, Canada’s largest pipeline company, take the lead with 60 percent ownership, with the rest going to the APG, a Calgary-based organization representing aboriginal groups in the North,” the newspaper reported.

“The new partnership is expected to seek help from Ottawa in the form of loan guarantees, shipping commitments or other breaks for the multi-billion-dollar project,” Financial Post sources said.

Under what the newspaper referred to “the so-called Plan B,” the oil companies that are part of the Mackenzie Gas Project — Imperial (almost 70 percent owned by ExxonMobil), Shell, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil — would become shippers with long-term commitments.

TransCanada involvement in the Mackenzie pipeline to date has been financing APG. The Financial Post said said its involvement in Plan B “would be welcomed by oil companies outside the Imperial partnership that would also like to ship gas on the system.”

The newspaper also said TransCanada’s “involvement is seen as improving the pipeline’s chances of success because the regulated company has lower profit expectations than oil companies.”

Rumors of the new deal surfaced in late November, around the time that two years of regulatory hearings on the Mackenzie line ended.

Imperial spokesman Pius Rolheiser would not comment on the rumors, the Financial Post said. Rolheiser told the newspaper that a decision from the National Energy Board on whether the project can move ahead is expected in mid-2009. A spokesman for TransCanada would also not comment.

—Kay Cashman



Did you find this article interesting?
Tweet it
TwitThis
Digg it
Digg
Print this story | Email it to an associate.

Click here to subscribe to Petroleum News for as low as $69 per year.


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
circulation@PetroleumNews.com --- http://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.