SEARCH our ARCHIVE of over 14,000 articles
Vol. 15, No. 31 Week of August 01, 2010
Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry

Sale chatter resumes

Alaska assets often mentioned as BP replaces Hayward, ups divestiture target

Wesley Loy

For Petroleum News

Speculation has blazed up again, perhaps with greater intensity than ever, that BP will sell part or all of its ownership stake in Prudhoe Bay and perhaps other oil fields on Alaska’s North Slope.

BP stoked the conjecture when it announced July 27 that it will divest assets worth up to $30 billion over the next 18 months. That’s triple the amount the company previously said it would spin off to help meet huge expenses associated with the catastrophic Gulf of Mexico rig explosion and oil spill.

BP also announced that its scorned chief executive, Tony Hayward, would step down effective Oct. 1 and that an American, Bob Dudley, would replace him.

The New York-born, Mississippi-raised Dudley, 54, joined BP from Amoco after the two companies merged in 1998. He’s been leading BP’s cleanup and compensation programs in the Gulf, and from 2003 until late 2008, he headed BP’s Russian joint venture, TNK-BP.

“Today is a very sad day for me,” Hayward said in a July 27 news conference. “As many of you are well aware, I have spent my entire professional career at BP. I love the company and everything it stands for. I’ve thought long and hard over the last month or so about what is the right course of action to take. It is clear that this tragedy will leave BP a changed company, and that to move forward, particularly in the United States, it should do so under new leadership.”

BP further announced that it sustained a $17.2 billion loss for the second quarter of 2010, compared to a $4.4 billion gain for the second quarter of 2009.

Divestment plans

BP said it intends to sell properties with total value of $25 billion to $30 billion. The total includes the $7 billion deal BP and Apache Corp. announced on July 20 for an assortment of assets in western Canada, Egypt and the Permian basin of Texas and New Mexico.

Future sale properties will come “primarily in the upstream business, and selected on the basis that they are worth more to other companies than to BP,” the company said.

This process of “portfolio high grading” will leave the company with “a smaller but higher quality” exploration and production business, BP said.

“We have done a review of assets around the world,” Dudley said in the July 27 news conference. He didn’t specify, however, exactly where BP is looking to sell.

The company said it was taking a charge of $32.2 billion to reflect the impact of the Gulf disaster, including spill response costs to date of $2.9 billion and $29.3 billion in expected future costs such as damage claims, fines and lawsuits.

Some positive rays did manage to shine through on BP’s day of big announcements.

For one thing, the leaking Macondo well has been capped with efforts now far along to seal it permanently.

BP also said its capital spending for 2010 and 2011 will be about $18 billion a year, “in line with previous forecasts.”

The financial impact on BP has been very substantial, “but our businesses around the world are performing well and our cash flow is strong,” said BP’s chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg.

Rampant Alaska speculation

A couple of weeks ago, the chatter out of Wall Street and London was that Apache might pay as much as much as $12 billion for BP properties on the North Slope.

That didn’t happen, as Apache spent elsewhere.

But now, given BP’s much higher divestiture target, the speculation seems hotter than ever that BP surely will sell its Prudhoe stake and perhaps its interest in other fields including the many Prudhoe satellites, the BP-operated Milne Point field and the ConocoPhillips-operated Kuparuk field.

Although BP is a minority owner, it operates vast Prudhoe.

State records show that BP holds a 26.36 percent working interest in the Prudhoe Bay unit, ExxonMobil owns 36.40 percent, ConocoPhillips owns 36.08 percent, and Chevron holds 1.16 percent.

BP, in its most recent annual report filed March 5 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said its net share of production from Prudhoe Bay was 69,000 barrels per day in 2009.

Overall, BP’s Alaska production was 181,000 barrels per day in 2009, with 45,000 barrels coming from Kuparuk, 24,000 from Milne Point and 43,000 from other sources such as the offshore Northstar field.

Aside from its interests in these fields, BP also holds other very important assets in connection with its Alaska operations, including a 46.9 percent stake in the 800-mile trans-Alaska pipeline, and partial ownership of a fleet of new double-hulled oil tankers.

The speculation is that BP will look to sell mature or declining assets such as Prudhoe.

“The most likely buyers,” The New York Times wrote July 27 on its DealBook news service, are BP’s partners in Prudhoe — ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Chevron.

Not so fast

If past experience is any indication, however, a sale to these partners, particularly ConocoPhillips, could present difficult problems.

In 1999, after BP’s takeover of Atlantic Richfield Co. was announced, the Federal Trade Commission stepped in with antitrust concerns. ARCO at the time held a big stakes in both Prudhoe and Kuparuk, two of the nation’s largest oil fields. The FTC opposed the merger on grounds that BP could exert too much control over West Coast gasoline markets.

The solution was to carve out ARCO’s Alaska assets and deal them to a third player, Phillips Petroleum out of Oklahoma.

But ExxonMobil temporarily threw that plan into disarray when it filed a lawsuit in ARCO’s hometown of Los Angeles asserting that it had the right of first refusal to buy ARCO’s North Slope properties but wasn’t given the chance.

Eventually, ExxonMobil was satisfied, Phillips ultimately acquired ARCO Alaska, and Phillips in 2002 merged with Conoco to become what we known today as ConocoPhillips.

If BP does move to sell some or all of its Prudhoe stake, the transaction probably will be complex, with all the field’s heavyweight owners having some say in the matter. And maybe government regulators, too.

Did you find this article interesting?
Tweet it
Digg it
Print this story | Email it to an associate.

Click here to subscribe to Petroleum News for as low as $69 per year.

Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
circ[email protected] --- ---

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.