|
Finding the pieces of a Susitna jigsaw DGGS-led team carries out successful first field season, looking for natural gas potential in the Tertiary rocks of Susitna basin Alan Bailey Petroleum News
A team of scientists led by Alaska’s Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys, or DGGS, has been moving ahead with an investigation of the hydrocarbon geology of Alaska’s Susitna basin, the geologic basin under the huge area of lowland lakes and muskeg of the Susitna Valley, north of Anchorage. With known coal seams and a geology which appears somewhat similar to that of the prolific Cook Inlet basin to the immediate southwest, geologists think that the Susitna basin may have potential for natural gas development, an enticing prospect given the proximity of Alaska Railbelt population centers and the tightening of Cook Inlet gas supplies.
In addition to DGGS geologists, the team includes scientists from Alaska’s Division of Oil and Gas, from the U.S. Geological Survey and from Purdue University. Funding comes from a couple of state grants authorized by the state Legislature.
10-day program In May the DGGS-led team successfully completed a 10-day field program, doing reconnaissance field work in the basin, DGGS geologist Dave LePain told Petroleum News Nov. 14. The weather cooperated and we obtained a good, basic data set, he said.
The vast majority of the gas produced from the neighboring Cook Inlet basin is what geologists refer to as “biogenic gas,” produced from the bacterial decomposition of organic material in rocks. This is distinct from “thermogenic gas” that forms when organic material is heated to appropriate temperatures. And in the Cook Inlet basin the biogenic gas has flowed into gas field reservoir rocks from coal seams, as forces within the Earth’s crust lift the coal seams up, lowering the pressure in the coal.
The fundamental question is whether the Cook Inlet biogenic gas model works in the Susitna basin, LePain said.
Cook Inlet comparisons Maps of the Susitna basin geology published by the U.S. Geological Survey 30 to 40 years ago indicate the presence of rock strata of Tertiary age, with the USGS geologists having correlated these strata with apparently similar strata in the Cook Inlet basin — Cook Inlet biogenic gas comes from Tertiary coals and all producing gas fields have reservoirs in Tertiary sandstones.
Among other things, the DGGS team wants to assess how closely the Susitna Tertiary rocks resemble and correlate with those in the Cook Inlet basin; to assess the ways in which the Susitna rocks were deposited; and to seek evidence for the history of how the basin formed and evolved, LePain explained. The Tertiary strata were deposited from ancient river systems, with sand-filled river channels having the potential to form gas reservoirs, and with areas of mud deposited from flooding between rivers possibly sealing gas in those reservoirs, where mudstones overlie abandoned river channel-fill deposits. Lush vegetation in swamps would have later transformed into coal seams that potentially source gas.
For the field program, the team split into two groups, one of which investigated the nature of the Tertiary strata, developing an understanding of the types of river system that operated in the basin and collating data about the Tertiary stratigraphy, LePain said. The other group examined exposures of Mesozoic rocks at the basin margins, looking for evidence that would shed light on the basin’s history, he said.
Isolated exposures Given the general lack of bedrock exposure in the swamps and forests of the Susitna Valley, field geology in the Susitna basin can be fairly challenging. However, there are rock outcrops scattered around the basin margins, and within the basin there are some discontinuous, isolated exposures where rivers have cut into the ground. Although individual exposures along river banks are widely scattered and are typically only 30 to 100 meters in extent, each exposure tends to reveal some different aspect of the Tertiary stratigraphy, thus acting as a piece of a fragmented jigsaw puzzle which upon assembly leads to a view of the entire Tertiary succession.
And the field geologists documented detailed measured stratigraphic sections along the rock exposures.
In general, the group investigating the nature of the Tertiary rocks confirmed the earlier finding of the USGS that the rocks of the Susitna basin bear striking resemblances to rocks of equivalent age in the Cook Inlet basin, LePain said. However, there are also some rocks that appear distinctly different. For example, one exposure on Lake Creek in the northwestern part of the basin exhibited conglomerates with massive granitic boulders lying directly over more typical sandstones and mudstones, similar to those of the Cook Inlet Tyonek formation, LePain said. The granitic material in the conglomerate does not match any rocks now observed nearby, and the nature of the rocks indicates the past existence of a geologic structure that would have created a steep surface gradient down which streams would have carried the boulders and other detritus.
To gain detailed insights into the ages of the various Tertiary rocks, the geologists collected plant fossils and rock samples containing plant pollen. A consultant firm in Anchorage is now evaluating the fossil and pollen samples.
Basin margins The field group investigating the history of the basin looked at geologic structures in rocks exposed at the basin margins, documenting the geometry of the folding and faulting of the rock strata. The group collected samples of the older Mesozoic rocks that are seen in surface outcrop at the basin edges and in a couple of areas inside the basin where the older rocks have been pushed up to the surface. Inside the basin, in general, the older Mesozoic rocks lie underneath the younger Tertiary strata. The Mesozoic samples have gone to a laboratory for an evaluation of their thermal histories, to help shed light on any uplift of the strata that may have occurred in the past.
The DGGS led team is now waiting for the results from the laboratory testing of the various rock samples collected during the field program. However, the team is also in the process of incorporating some subsurface data into its basin analysis, tying that data into its field findings. The subsurface data consists of publicly available data from the handful of wells that have been drilled in the basin, and data from a couple of Chevron seismic lines that the team has been able to use with permission.
2013 next The team plans to do one more field program in the basin, but does not anticipate doing that field work until 2013. The two-year pause between field seasons will afford the team adequate time to evaluate the results from this year’s field work and complete its follow up data analysis before planning the next program. The division anticipates publishing some preliminary results later this winter or in the spring, LePain said.
By getting relevant geological data into the public domain, the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys’ work helps spur exploration investment in basins such as this and provides government policy makers with useful information to aid in making land use decisions, LePain said.
|