HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PETROLEUM NEWS BAKKEN MINING NEWS

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
May 2012

Vol. 17, No. 19 Week of May 06, 2012

Carbon capture plan canceled

Push to showcase Alberta’s bid to curb greenhouse gas emissions through carbon capture and storage delayed by lack of buyers

Gary Park

For Petroleum News

The Alberta government’s grand dream of cleaning up its global image by capturing greenhouse gas emissions for enhanced oil recovery and selling its technology internationally has been dealt a major blow.

Calgary-based utility company TransAlta, along with partners Enbridge and Capital Power Corp., have dumped their planned carbon capture and storage CCS project, saying they were unable to secure enough buyers for the carbon dioxide to justify proceeding with the C$1.4 billion venture.

As a result, TransAlta has decided it is better off paying Alberta’s penalties of C$15 per metric ton for excess emissions from its Keephills 3 coal-fired plant near Edmonton rather than curbing them.

Project Pioneer was to have received C$779 million in Alberta and Canadian government funding over 15 years and become the showcase of Alberta’s offer of C$2 billion in funding for its attempt to overcome widespread doubts that CCS could be profitable.

Alberta still committed to targets

Alberta Environment and Water Minister Diana McQueen said her government will try to figure out why Pioneer failed, including the role carbon pricing had in the decision to shelve a venture that has cost C$30 million so far, with two-thirds coming from the governments.

She said Alberta remains determined to meet its carbon emissions targets, insisting Project Pioneer was only one of four efforts to make the economics work.

Project Pioneer was designed to capture and store 1 million metric tons a year of CO2 from Keephills 3 to rebuild reservoir pressures in enhanced oil recovery schemes in central Alberta.

But TransAlta said in a statement that it had been unable to secure firm buyers for the CO2, while Canadian and Alberta governments had made no moves towards a cap-and-trade system that would allow the partnership to sell emission-reduction credits.

TransAlta said the partners “determined that although the technology works and capital costs are in line with expectations, the revenue from carbon sales and the price of emissions reductions are insufficient to allow the project to proceed at this time.”

Regulatory uncertainty

Don Wharton, TransAlta’s vice president, policy and sustainability, said there was too much uncertainty over regulatory frameworks that have yet to be developed, although his company believes there is still a future for CCS.

He said about C$30 million had been spent on initial engineering and design, two-thirds of that from governments.

Enhance Energy, which had Alberta financial support to build a CO2 pipeline from Project Pioneer, reported agreement with only one oil producer, Fairborne Energy, to buy CO2 for a small oil field.

Bruce Peachey, an Edmonton-based consulting engineer and EOR advocate, told a Calgary conference that the estimated rate of return is not economic for CCs projects.

“It has to be more economic than anything else that shareholders’ money can be invested in,” he said.

Higher penalties required

Industry observers have estimated that penalties of US$30-US$80 per metric ton would have to be imposed on CO2 emitters to make CCS economical.

Peachey said CO2 EOR reserve estimates “must be based on economic reality, not wishful thinking” and not the Alberta government’s primary goal of CO2 disposal.

He also said the CO2 supply outlook in Alberta is dramatically lower than was expected two years ago.

EOR operators want high-purity CO2, while emissions from coal-fired power plants contain more nitrogen than CO2, making the cost of separating out the CO2 prohibitively expensive.

The only large-scale CO2 EOR venture in Canada is a Cenovus Energy project at Weyburn, Saskatchewan, which has been operating for 11 years.

Chris Severson-Baker, a spokesman for Alberta-based Pembina Institute, said the cancelation is a “big setback,” reflecting the Canadian government’s failure to implement a climate change policy that would serve as an incentive for Project Pioneer.

Canada’s Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver was “disappointed” with the partners’ decision.

“Our government continues to invest in a number of (CCS) projects that are advancing across Canada and we will continue research and development with governments, industry and academia.”

However, Alberta Premier Alison Redford, who inherited the CCS committed from her predecessor Ed Stelmach, indicated a loss of hope last November when she suggested Project Pioneer might not go ahead and C$400 million in Alberta taxpayers’ money might be better used on other “initiatives and opportunities.”

Danielle Smith, leader of the Wildrose party in the Alberta election, had pledged to stop all Alberta financing for the experiment. She is now positioned to wage that fight from the opposition seats in the Alberta legislature.





Canadian biofuels plant scrapped

Royal Dutch Shell and Ottawa-based technology company Iogen have delivered a blow to Canada’s hopes of advancing renewable fuels by scuttling plans for a biofuels plant in Manitoba and laying off 150 people in the process.

The partners said that while pulling back from their larger-scale venture they will continue with a smaller-scale research project to develop cellulosic ethanol from agricultural waste.

Iogen said Shell will “explore multiple pathways to find a commercial solution for the production of advanced biofuels on an industrial scale.”

Iogen has been unable to solve engineering problems that stand in the way of a commercially viable plant.

But it was singled for mention in Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s 2007 budget, when the government allocated C$500 million to Sustainable Development Technology Canada to develop next-generation biofuels from agricultural, forestry and municipal waste, rather than corn and wheat to make ethanol and biodiesel.

Shell first invested in Iogen 10 years ago and the partnership has operated a demonstration plant since 2004.

Iogen will still employ 110 people at its Ottawa headquarters to work on expanding new technology for production of biofuels made from cellulose.

The Canadian and provincial governments spend about C$250 million a year to subsidize production of biofuels by major petroleum companies such as Suncor Energy and Husky Energy, estimates think-tank George Morris Center.

Scott Thurlow, president of the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association, said the Shell-Iogen decision does not threaten the future of biofuels production.

“Just like any other fuel, it takes time to build up the necessary capital,” he said.

—Gary Park


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
[email protected] --- http://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.