HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PAY HERE

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
December 2005

Vol. 10, No. 52 Week of December 25, 2005

Revenue forecast: prices up, volume down

Change in production forecast due to maintenance, slower moving heavy oil, delay in projects like Point Thomson, Liberty

Kristen Nelson

Petroleum News Editor-in-Chief

Prices being paid for Alaska North Slope crude oil are up, Alaska Revenue Commissioner Bill Corbus said Dec. 15, but ANS production continues a decline that began in 1988.

The department’s fall revenue forecast, released Dec. 15, forecasts ANS crude oil production averaging 865,000 barrels per day for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, a 5.6 percent decrease from FY ’05 when production averaged 917,000 bpd. Over the next decade volumes are projected to continue to decline, averaging 800,000 bpd in 2016, which represents an annual average decline of 0.75 percent per year from FY ’06 to FY ’16.

Crude oil prices on the West Coast are projected at $57.30 per barrel for FY ’06, a 32 percent increase over $43.43 per barrel for FY ’05. ANS crude oil prices are forecast to decline to $40.95 per barrel in FY ’07. Beyond 2008, prices are forecast at $25.50 per barrel.

Corbus noted in the Fall 2005 Revenue Sources Book that while the fiscal year-to-date average price for ANS on the West Coast is more than $58 per barrel, “price instability continues.” He told the press, “three times during the last two decades the price of oil has dropped more than $15 per barrel over a seven-week period.”

Factors behind volatility of oil prices include increased global demand for oil, particularly in China, supply interruptions due to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico hurricanes, Iraqi production interruptions and changing Russian and Venezuelan oil policies. Corbus said there is also “a perception factor,” a combination of those previously noted “plus the threat of terrorism.”

The price differential between ANS crude oil delivered to the West Coast and West Texas Intermediate “has stabilized at about $2 a barrel. Last spring that price differential showed a great deal of volatility, but it has returned to historic norms,” he said.

The department has added a section on natural gas, Corbus said, and is “estimating for fiscal year 2006, $9.19 per million Btu; and for the years 2009 through 2016, we are estimating a price of $6.25 per million Btu.”

Production timing

The forecast updates production volume details including decreases due to unplanned disruptions, maintenance or repair work that may reduce crude oil flow.

Petroleum engineer Dudley Platt, who has worked on the production numbers for the state for 16 years, said the biggest change in production numbers from the spring forecast is in the timing of when the state gets the barrels.

Ultimately recoverable reserves (from 2005 through 2040) were forecast at about 7.25 billion barrels in the spring, Platt said. “That equivalent number for the fall is 7.15 billion barrels.”

The timing of when those barrels will be produced has changed, dropping roughly 50,000 barrels per day for the next nine or 10 fiscal years compared to volumes projected in the spring.

When a gas pipeline starts up, “2014-15-16,” then those additional barrels will begin to be recovered, Platt said.

More maintenance

The first reason for the change in production levels is that the state has “reevaluated the downtime associated with some of our more mature fields on the North Slope,” Platt said. Prudhoe Bay shut down 70 wells earlier in the year for maintenance work, “that’s 20,000 barrels a day through this year and well into next year,” he said.

Equipment and facilities on the North Slope are starting to show their age, “not unexpected,” and when things break they have to be fixed and that reduces production levels. There were events at the Prudhoe Bay Central Gas Facilities, Platt said, and downtime at Flow Station 2 that was associated with tying in some of the heavy oil developments that will feed into that facility.

Also affecting the production forecast is a “slightly slowed ... pace of development for the heavy oil.” The North Slope producers have done a “phenomenal job over the last five or six years on West Sak for instance,” getting 6,000 bpd out of a single five-leg well, where 20 years ago they would have been happy to get 300 bpd out of a West Sak well, he said.

Production is beginning from the J-pad heavy oil development, with some oil starting to come on there, but “they’ve just slowed it down” to reevaluate reservoir performance. “Same thing’s happening at the Schrader Bluff field at Milne Point; same thing’s happened at the fairly sizeable Orion satellite field in western Prudhoe Bay.”

Platt characterized this as the companies digesting some of the new information they’re getting from those fields.

Also delays in project startups

The production forecast has also dropped because of delays in estimates of when some projects will come online.

Point Thomson has been delayed two and a half years because the project changed from gas cycling to gas sales and “70,000 barrels a day of condensate just moved from 2011 to sometime beyond that,” which also defers 30,000 bpd of “oil that’s associated with satellite fields in the vicinity of the Point Thomson field.” There will also be an overall production impact: “Relative to the gas cycling project you’re not going to get as much gas condensates” produced from Point Thomson, he said.

Platt said he also was more conservative with Liberty, moving startup from that field out three-quarters of a year.

The department is also forecasting a change in Cook Inlet production, a 16 percent drop in FY ’05 from 23,000 bpd in the spring forecast, to 19,000 bpd. The North Slope drop for FY ’05 is only 0.3 percent, 920,000 bpd to 917,000 bpd, but is steeper in succeeding fiscal years, 5 percent for FY ’06, 7.5 percent for FY ’07 and 9.8 percent for FY ’08.





$400 million proposed for gas pipeline investment

High oil prices are projected to give the State of Alaska a surplus of $1.2 billion for the current fiscal year, Gov. Frank Murkowski told Commonwealth North Dec. 15. In addition to earmarking about half of that surplus, $565 million, for education and $130 million for other state needs, the governor proposed saving $400 million for investment in the gas line.

Cheryl Frasca, director of the Office of Management and Budget, told the press that details weren’t available, but would be included in legislation introduced during the session for a “corporate structure that would be responsible for advancing the state’s role as owner in the pipeline.” The $400 million would probably be a capital appropriation, she said, “and by statute capital appropriations last for five years.”

Those monies would be part of what the state would put into a gas pipeline project, probably around a billion dollars, in equity before project financing is available from bonding, said Steve Porter, deputy commissioner of the Department of Revenue. For a $20 billion project, with the state taking 20 percent, and 80 percent project funded and 20 percent equity funded, the state needs to come up with “about a billion dollars” in equity, he said. “Equity generally funds the front end of a project, before you can bond the project finances, so most of the equity funding would be in the first four or five years of the project.”

Frasca said the $400 million isn’t based on specific items, but is based on “carving out some of the surplus from this year” to fund the gas pipeline.

“Actually,” quipped Porter, “I wanted a billion and they wouldn’t give it to me.”

The $1.2 billion surplus is mostly current 2006 fiscal year monies.

For the 2007 fiscal year (the budget presented Dec. 15) the governor proposed additional investment in infrastructure, including industrial roads, and investing in University of Alaska research to make that an industry, with a focus on biomedical, behavioral health and Arctic-related research.

In the job training area the governor proposed funding to help prepare the work force needed for the gas pipeline.

He also proposed a feasibility study involving the state and the Yukon and U.S. federal government to extend rail service from Alaska into Canada. He said there are 1,000 miles of line to build, but it would be possible to complete the project before gas line construction begins, reducing the cost of the gas pipeline and thus reducing the tariff and increasing the value of the state’s gas.

—Kristen Nelson


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469
[email protected] --- https://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)Š1999-2019 All rights reserved. The content of this article and website may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law.