HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PAY HERE

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
March 2024

Vol. 29, No.12 Week of March 24, 2024

This month in history: ConocoPhillips dominates Alaska exploration

20 years ago this month: Company has drilled or participated in 43 exploration wells in 6 years, acquired more than a million acres

Kristen Nelson

Petroleum News

Editor's note: This story first appeared in the March 21, 2004, issue of Petroleum News.

ConocoPhillips Alaska plans as many as four exploration wells on Alaska's North Slope this winter, 2003-04. Three wells have spud -- Carbon and Scout No. 1 in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska -- and Placer on the western edge of the Kuparuk River unit. A third NPR-A well is planned, using one of the two rigs already drilling there, Rick Mott, ConocoPhillips Alaska's vice president of exploration and land, told Petroleum News March 4, 2004, and a second well at Placer has been permitted as a contingency, depending on results from the first Placer well.

Mott said ConocoPhillips has drilled or participated in 43 exploration wells in Alaska in the last 6 years, "which is just a very significant proportion of the total number of wells." The 43 include the wells being drilled this winter season.

In addition, the company has shot some 3,400 square miles of 3D seismic in those 6 years, including this winter's work.

"And we've leased over 1 million acres of exploration acreage," he said.

"There's no one else in the industry that comes close in my opinion to that sort of commitment to Alaska."

In NPR-A, Mott said, ConocoPhillips has interests in 1.1 million acres, 750,000 acres if you look at just ConocoPhillips' share of the leases. Its other federal acreage is Minerals Management Service leases on the outer continental shelf, some 99,000 acres, Mott said, "almost all Beaufort Sea," with just some 2,000 acres in Cook Inlet.

The company's interest in state exploration acreage is approximately 446,000 acres, 88,000 acres of which is offshore.

Well count can be misleading

Mott noted that some people track the company by the number of exploration wells it drills.

But, he said, that's misleading, because the number of wells is not a measure of what the company is spending on exploration.

Mott said the company does not release its exploration budget for Alaska, but "this is a fairly typical year, with respect to budget years for Alaska. What changes from year to year, though, is what our working interest is in wells and where they're located."

For example, a few years back, he said, the company had a 20% interest in the Trailblazer well in NPR-A, with partners Chevron and BP. In this winter's wells, however, ConocoPhillips has a 78% working interest.

Because of the higher working interest, Mott said, one of the company's wells this year would be the equivalent of its cost to participate in four Trailblazer wells.

The company's exploration investment in Alaska is not down, he said, "it's our working interest that varies from year to year."

Location is also an important cost factor.

Compared to a well within a field, a well "maybe 5 miles away" will cost twice as much.

"If you go more than 20 miles away, you're probably talking about four times as expensive."

At 50 miles away, he said, the cost can be 10 times that of a well within a field.

"And if you go offshore. you're talking about 20 times as expensive."

People who want to play the well-count game, Mott said, "should look at where the wells are located."

For instance. at Puviaq, in northwestern NPR-A, the company moved equipment by rolligon from both Deadhorse and Barrow, driving "over 26,000 miles in rolligons at 10 miles an hour," he said.

Mott said what really drives Alaska costs home to him is a comparison with costs at the company's prospects worldwide.

Offshore West Africa, ConocoPhillips can drill a well "in 2,000 feet of water depth less expensively than we can drill a well, say, 50 miles out in the NPR-A. Significantly less expensively -- like two-thirds the cost."

Costs a concern

Alaska is a sanctioned exploration play for ConocoPhillips, Mott said, but that doesn't mean cost isn't a factor.

The company looks "at the opportunities in plays and basins" and does "screening-level evaluations of those basins and those plays."

There are only a handful of sanctioned plays in the world.

"It's not like Alaska is number 28 out of 50," he said, there are "only a few in the world."

"So, Alaska's very important to ConocoPhillips in its exploration program."

"And in essence that gives us a hunting license, if you will, that we can go out and look for opportunities in those plays because we think they have economic potential to be interesting to us."

But the expense of drilling in Alaska should be of concern to Alaskans, Mott said, because once prospects are identified, ConocoPhillips looks at reserve size, risk and "the value per barrel and the cost."

We can't impact the reserve size, we "have to take what the basin gives us."

Technology and the skill of its people enable the company "to try and understand the risk ... and reduce it to the irreducible point."

Then there is the element of cost. ConocoPhillips' engineering and drilling staff work on the most cost-effective way to go after a prospect.

But, Mott said, "the attractiveness of the basin will also be driven by the natural logistics problems of Alaska and ... by the cost of our contractors."

The bottom line, he said, is that "we all have a stake in cost" and ConocoPhillips needs the "help and assistance and cooperation" of its contractors in the cost area.

When the value per barrel is evaluated, engineering has a role to play, but "we do have a natural challenge" -- an 800-mile pipeline and "then a several-thousand-mile boat trip to get to market." And both contractors and state government have a role there.

ConocoPhillips will "continue to try to be creative and we'll work on our job part and try and find significant reserves and minimize the risk, and we'll try and be smart in our engineering approaches to drive down cost, but we need the help of our contractors and certainly state government."

Because, Mott said, "If costs go up ... or value goes down, value per barrel goes down (and) it makes Alaska less attractive."

"It sounds like a political statement," he said, "but it's not a political statement -- it's reality."

Right now, Alaska is still one of ConocoPhillips' "favorite plays and favorite localities in the world. And we hope everyone will work with us to keep it that way."






Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469
[email protected] --- https://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)�1999-2019 All rights reserved. The content of this article and website may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law.