HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PAY HERE

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
June 2003

Vol. 8, No. 22 Week of June 01, 2003

Alaska terminates BP’s Slugger unit

Kay Cashman, Petroleum News publisher & managing editor

The state of Alaska terminated the 79,508 acre unit Slugger unit on May 16 because the owners of the eastern North Slope prospect had not met a commitment to drill the first Slugger unit well by May 15, state officials told Petroleum News May 28.

State Division of Oil and Gas Director Mark Myers notified unit operator BP Exploration (Alaska) by certified mail of the termination. He said the primary terms of 11 of the unit’s 14 leases have expired and had to be surrendered immediately, plus a drilling extension charge of $430,000 was due by June 1.

Myers said two of the remaining Slugger leases have not expired and will continue in force until Aug. 15. Oil and gas lease ADL 389656, issued Dec. 1, 2001, with a seven year primary term, will expire Nov. 30, 2008, unless extended.

An appeal of this action must be filed within 20 calendar days; if no appeal is filed by that time, the termination becomes final 31 days after issuance, he told BP.

Hunt for partners unsuccessful

BP (42 percent) and its partners in the Slugger unit, ChevronTexaco (33 percent) and ConocoPhillips (25 percent), have been looking for partners to help fund the exploration well, but have been unsuccessful.

Sometime in 2001 or early 2002, the three partners had farmed out part of their working interest in the unit to independents Forest Oil and Andex Resources in exchange for a disproportionate share of the costs of Slugger No.1. Under the deal, Andex and Forest would each receive approximately a 20 percent working interest in the unit.

But they needed one more partner.

In early 2002 it appeared that Anadarko Petroleum would be that partner, but then Andex dropped out of the deal. Shortly thereafter, Anadarko spokesman Mark Hanley said his company had decided not to participate in the prospect.

A BP spokesman told Petroleum News that his company was offering “very attractive terms” for a working interest in the unit, which BP estimates holds some 280 million barrels of oil.

“BP’s future exploration focus is on acreage close to existing infrastructure. While Slugger is an interesting prospect, it does not fit this strategy,” he said, referring to BP’s decision to close its frontier exploration office in Alaska and to concentrate on infield exploration where the company has had its most success.

Risky but could be brought on-line quickly, says Chevron

The northern border of the Slugger unit is just 12 miles from BP’s Badami’s processing facilities, which BP had said could be used to process and ship Slugger crude to Endicott, 26 miles to the west, and then to the trans-Alaska oil pipeline.

Badami was expected to hold 120 million barrels of recoverable oil and produce approximately 35,000 barrels per day at its peak. Instead, the unit is producing in the range of 2,000 barrels a day.

In 2001, a Chevron representative told Petroleum News, “One of the reasons we like Slugger is it should ring the cash register faster than our other North Slope exploration prospects since, if successful, the production will likely be processed at the existing Badami facilities.”

Bob Howard, vice president of Chevron’s Alaska business unit, said Sept. 9, 2002, that his firm was “concerned by the lack of interest in Slugger. There is a fair share of risk along with reward. … Another partner will clearly have to be obtained. We’re not ready to take on more working interest in this project than we already have.”

Exploration well would cost $16-$19 million

When operator BP began advertising Slugger and two Badami satellites in 2001, it published a brochure — “BP Exploration Alaska Farm-in Opportunities” — inviting companies to invest for drilling in the winters of 2003 and 2004.

Well costs, BP said in its brochure, were estimated to be $16 million to $19 million for an initial exploration well, with completion running $500,000 to $1 million.

Development wells were expected to cost $5 million to $11 million each.

BP’s total project cost estimates, including everything from finding and development to transport to the West Coast, was listed as $12-13.50 per barrel.

In September 2002, shortly after BP told Petroleum News it would not be drilling a Slugger well the following winter because it was short one partner, Myers said “it isn’t over until it’s over.” He said the Slugger unit deadlines could be extended if “it’s in the best interest of the state to do so. We would need reasonable assurances from BP that they were going to get the capital to explore and be compensated for lost time.”

Myers said in mid-May that no extension had been requested by BP.






Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469
[email protected] --- https://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)Š1999-2019 All rights reserved. The content of this article and website may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law.