An open or shut case Enbridge predicts Northern Gateway decision before deadline to start construction GARY PARK For Petroleum News
Enbridge is within months of a crux decision on its decade-long battle to build the Northern Gateway pipeline and open a Pacific Rim market for oil sands crude from Alberta.
Chief Executive Officer Al Monaco told analysts earlier in December “it’s probably going to be in the latter half of 2016, if I had to make a guess.” Currently, Enbridge has only until 2016 to start construction.
Otherwise he provided no clear hints on whether Enbridge will: 1) Sanction the C$7.9 billion venture, setting the stage for a heavyweight legal showdown; 2) Try relocating the tanker port from Kitimat on the northern British Columbia coast; 3) Abandon the project altogether; 4) Launch a new, creative alternative.
Although Northern Gateway was conditionally approved by the previous Canadian government under Stephen Harper, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has called for a ban on tanker traffic off the north coast.
Monaco said Trudeau and Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr have signaled “their openness to listen; they have talked about the importance of Canada securing markets, so all we can say at this point is that we are looking forward to engaging federal staff on this.”
Winning over First Nations For now, Enbridge will plug on with its efforts to win over First Nations affected by the pipeline route and terminal location.
“We have 28 aboriginal partners that are keen to invest in the project (as 10 percent equity partners) alongside us so we will be working with them ... and hopefully we will have some good discussions with all levels of government,” Monaco said.
He said Enbridge will speak with British Columbia’s provincial and municipal governments and local communities to ensure people have a full understanding of the project, which is designed to export 525,000 barrels per day of crude bitumen, mostly to Asia, and import 193,000 bpd of condensate to thin bitumen and facilitate pipeline shipments.
Monaco said the slump in oil prices has lowered production in Alberta, meaning his company should be able to serve its customers without Northern Gateway for the next little while.
“So, in a way, timing (of Northern Gateway) isn’t too concerning for us. We continue to work on the kind of things we need as far as communities, First Nations and governments” are concerned.
Belief in project dwindles Outside the Enbridge executive suite, belief in the project has dwindled to the point that it no longer arouses heated discussion.
Analysts seldom bother to raise questions on conference calls, while contracting and engineering firms have turned their attention elsewhere and Enbridge has yet to report that any of the 209 conditions attached by the National Energy Board and federal government have been resolved, although it has filed progress reports on 15 of the items.
Some take the view that Enbridge is reluctant to admit to shareholders that its investment of about C$500 million in Northern Gateway should be written off.
The gloomy external mood was captured by Steve Williams, chief executive officer of Suncor Energy - a contracted shipper on the pipeline - who said Northern Gateway is “not executable” in its current form, arguing that more negotiations are needed with First Nations.
More hope for Energy East He said TransCanada’s proposed Energy East pipeline to deliver 1.1 million bpd of crude to Quebec and New Brunswick refineries and export tanker terminals holds greater promise.
“It is a complicated and long pipeline, but I think you’ve got to say that’s probably where betting money would be at the moment,” he said.
Laura Lau, a senior vice president with Brompton Funds, told the Globe and Mail that oil producers started seriously looking for other shipping options three years ago and, at this point, probably “see a higher probability in Energy East. A lot of pipe (including a natural gas pipeline to Ontario which would be converted to carry crude) is in the ground. And it is made-in-Canada. It is almost like a nation-building exercise.”
Although the Alberta government’s role in Northern Gateway decision-making is limited, Premier Rachel Notley said during the provincial election campaign last spring that a New Democratic Party administration would scrap provincial support for the project, saying it is not worth risking political capital.
Legislation to ban tankers Trudeau has directed Transport Minister Marc Garneau to prepare legislation banning oil tankers in north coast waters, but one expert suggests such a ban would be difficult to implement.
Robert Hage, a senior fellow at the University of Ottawa’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, told the Globe and Mail that a law would need to cover Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound to be effective - a possibility that would raise the ire of the United States, while a “mariner’s notice” would not have the force of law.
He said the government would be better off taking a broader look at how Canada can get oil and LNG to offshore markets, giving priority to including First Nations.
Gaetan Caron, a former chairman of the National Energy Board, said Northern Gateway could be a small, yet vital part of the Trudeau government’s pledge to achieve reconciliation with indigenous people. Such an agreement could see the pipeline go ahead, he said.
Also in the works is a court challenge by one First Nations group which the Federal Court of Canada is expected to rule on early in 2016.
|