HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
December 2002

Vol. 7, No. 50 Week of December 15, 2002

Expanding the scope

ConocoPhillips Alaska talking about three more Alpine satellites for a total of five; company plans to sanction Alpine facility expansion next year

Kristen Nelson

PNA Editor-in-Chief

The western North Slope is an area of growth for ConocoPhillips and the company is looking at developing five satellites to the Alpine field, and expanding the Alpine facilities to handle the additional production, Alpine is the major field within the Colville River unit.

“We’ve identified five potential satellites to the Alpine field,” ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc. President Kevin Meyers, told analysts Nov. 22. “We see five potential additional drill sites there,” with one or more of those drill sites in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

ConocoPhillips plans to sanction the first phase of Alpine facility expansion next year, he said.

Prior to this time, the company has talked publicly about only two Alpine satellites, Nanuq and Fiord.

Known discoveries in the area

The discoveries in the Alpine area over the past few years include Nanuq, south of Alpine, and Fiord to the north; both are on state lands in the Colville River unit (see the map on page 15). In NPR-A discoveries include Spark, Moose’s Tooth, Lookout and Rendezvous, west and southwest of the unit.

Phillips Alaska Inc. (now ConocoPhillips Alaska) and Anadarko Petroleum Corp. announced test production from Nanuq near Alpine in 2001, and said the accumulation is estimated to contain more than 40 million barrels of gross recoverable reserves. The Fiord discovery was pegged at more than 50 million barrels of gross recoverable reserves.

The NPR-A discoveries are 15 to 25 miles southwest of Alpine. The companies did not provide an estimate of recoverable barrels from the NPR-A discoveries, but the Alaska Department of Revenue used an estimate of 400 million barrels recoverable from the Rendezvous-Spark discoveries in its 2002 fall revenue forecast, with the caveat that major additional investment will be required to bring these reserves online.

Other wells in area

As to the other satellites — and what the reserves would be — the adjacent map from the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission shows drilling in the Alpine area, most of it Colville River unit production wells.

But the map also includes exploration wells drilled in the area and Revenue included in its fall forecast estimates of production from Alpine satellites, listed as “Nanuq, Fiord, etc.”, at 180 million barrels recoverable, twice the recoverable reserves the companies have stated for Nanuq (40 million) and Fiord (50 million).

ConocoPhillips would not identify the satellites under consideration for development. Dawn Patience, ConocoPhillips Alaska spokeswoman, told PNA Dec. 6:

“This is just one more step in assessing the economics of future developments to the west. A decision on funding the development of these projects will not be made until late 2004.”

Distance from processing

Distance from a processing facility is a factor in whether accumulations can be developed as satellites — or would require a new processing facility, as Alpine did.

An official with ConocoPhillips predecessor Phillips Alaska Inc. told PNA in 2001 that process engineers had to assess whether oil from Meltwater, the most distant of the Kuparuk satellites, could reach processing facilities unassisted. Meltwater is only 10 miles from Tarn, the nearest Kuparuk satellite, but 25 miles from the production facilities at Kuparuk.

Pumps were a consideration, as was partial processing at Meltwater, he said, but the engineers finally decided that with a large diameter pipe the energy of the reservoir would move the oil the 25 miles to the facilities, and Meltwater was developed as a drill pad, rather than a partial processing pad.

Alpine expansion to be phased

Meyers said the Alpine facility would be expanded to accommodate the five new drill sites. The first phase of expansion is expected to be sanctioned next year, he said.

“And we’re going to time those expansions consistent as we bring on those satellites.”

The Alpine facility, built to handle an expected 80,000 barrels per day, has at times handled more than 100,000 barrels a day.

The first additional production for Alpine would probably come from Fiord and Nanuq: under consideration for development for some time. Applications to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in late 2001 to lay gravel for the two pads said the proposed Colville Delta South (Nanuq) pad would be some five miles north of Nuiqsut and four miles south of the Alpine central processing facility.

The CD North (Fiord) pad would be approximately five miles north of the Alpine processing facility. A proposed timetable in that application said that, subject to permit approval, construction could begin in February 2003.

Patience told PNA Dec. 6 that the company “is working closely with state and federal regulatory agencies to evaluate our options for permitting future western North Slope developments, including an EIS option.”





Kay Cashman, PNA publisher

ConocoPhillips’ board of directors has approved a $6.6 billion capital budget for 2003, down 25 percent from the combined 2002 capital budgets of predecessor companies Phillips and Conoco, the company said in a statement Dec. 10.

Seventy-three percent — $4.4 billion — of 2003 dollars will go to exploration and production activities, with a “significant portion” of the capital funding going to the development of legacy asset positions. Refining, marketing and transportation will receive about 20 percent. The balance of the budget will be split among emerging businesses and general corporate uses.

Comparing apples and oranges

Alaska’s share of the 2003 capital budget is $640 million, down $167 million from the $807 million allocated in 2002. But ConocoPhillips Alaska spokeswoman Natalie Knox told PNA Dec. 11 that the 2003 budget for Alaska is actually the same as 2002 when you take two things into account.

“There was capitalized interest in last year’s budget and not in this year’s,” she said. Plus, “the capital spending for 2002 will be lower than forecast and therefore we expect the capital expenditure of $640 million for this year is actually flat with expected 2002 capital spending.”

Knox said 2002 capital expenditures will be lower than expected “due to phased development of western North Slope projects and due to the timing of tanker billings.”

The majority of the capital budget will “fund Greater Prudhoe, Kuparuk and western North Slope operations, and construction of Endeavor Class tankers to transport Alaska North Slope crude oil,” ConocoPhillips said.

ConocoPhillips would not provide a breakdown of Alaska’s capital budget at this time. In 2000 and 2001, exploration and production spending was $30 million out of a total budget of $535 million and $68 million out of a total budget of $874 million, which included the bulk of the construction budget for the Alpine production facilities and pipelines.

Fewer, more expensive wells

In 2002, $41 million was budgeted for exploration.

The company’s 2003 exploration plans have still not been formally announced, but even if exploration spending in 2003 is the same as 2002, the company will likely not drill seven wells this coming winter as it did in 2002, ConocoPhillips Alaska President Kevin Meyers told PNA Oct. 14.

Agency and PNA sources at ConocoPhillips say four wells is the most the company expects to drill this season on the North Slope. A sidetrack is also planned for the company’s Cosmopolitan prospect in the Cook Inlet Basin.

In response to a question about the number of wells his company would drill on the slope, Meyers said the number of wells does not necessarily reflect the amount of money spent, pointing to the high cost of the offshore McCovey exploration well which ConocoPhillips is partially funding (and EnCana is drilling) and the cost of drilling at Puviaq, a far west exploration well in NPR-A the company is expected to drill this winter.

He said, “It’s not just a question of the number of wells, it’s the question of the cost of the wells, too. The more remote you get from facilities, the higher the cost of the wells. So you may be having a pretty significant program because it’s dealing with wells that are remote, that are 50-100 miles from the nearest infrastructure. That tends to be more expensive program and so you may not be having the same well count, but you may actually be spending more dollars. So people tend to focus on well count, but it’s also just overall workload.”

Alaska, North Sea ‘legacy’ assets

ConocoPhillips CEO Jim Mulva said the reduced capital budget for other oil and gas provinces “is part of our disciplined approach toward improving return on capital employed. The leaner capital budget is strategically focused on growing our upstream segment, especially on developing legacy assets that provide strong returns over long periods of time.”

In a Nov. 22 presentation to analysts, Mulva said big legacy areas such as Alaska’s North Slope and the North Sea are the future focus for ConocoPhillips. (See cover story in the Dec. 8 edition of PNA.)

Here’s how Alaska fared against E&P spending in other parts of the world:

• Europe, Russia and the Caspian region, including additional expansion of positions in the southern North Sea and Norway and the development of the Kashagan field in the Caspian Sea: $950 million

• Canada, with a focus on Western Canadian gas, Syncrude expansion and Surmont heavy oil development: $410 million

• Lower 48 and Latin America, including continued development of ConocoPhillips’ acreage positions in the deepwater Gulf Mexico: $1.1 billion

• Middle East-Africa region: $160 million


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
[email protected] --- https://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©1999-2019 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.