HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PETROLEUM NEWS BAKKEN MINING NEWS

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
March 2002

Vol. 7, No. 11 Week of March 17, 2002

Shareholders back ConocoPhillips; merger awaits antitrust approval

Conoco plans to start construction of a commercial-size GTL plant in 2004; its location and size haven’t been decided

Allen Baker

PNA Contributing Writer

Shareholders of both Phillips and Conoco have voted overwhelmingly to approve the merger of the two companies. Yes votes came from 97 percent of Phillips shares voted, and from 96 percent of Conoco’s owners.

The only remaining hurdle is antitrust review by U.S. authorities.

European and Canadian regulators have already signed off on the $15.6 billion deal, and the Federal Trade Commission is considered likely to follow suit. The companies hope to turn into ConocoPhillips in the second half of this year.

Current Phillips Petroleum Co. shareholders will hold a slightly larger stake in the new company than the current Conoco Inc. owners. Phillips shareholders will receive 56.6 percent of the shares in the new company, which will be third-largest in the U.S. and sixth-biggest investor-owned oil firm in the world.

Jim Mulva, chairman and chief executive of Phillips, will be president and CEO. Archie W. Dunham, chairman and CEO of Conoco, will take the chairman’s job until 2004, when he plans to retire.

Phillips will pull its roots in Bartlesville, Okla., where it’s been the dominant employer for more than 80 years. The new company will have its headquarters in Houston, already home to Conoco.

“We believe the combination of these two companies will create significant value for all stakeholders and provide excellent financial and operational growth opportunities,” Mulva said in a statement after the March 12 votes were announced.

Executives working on the merger say they expect $750 million in “synergies,” from the combination. That can often mean job cuts.

For Alaska, there’s no overlap between the two companies, and so employment here isn’t likely to be affected. Conoco, which once was a significant Alaska explorer, left the state years ago.

For Phillips, the purchase of ARCO’s Alaska interests was a big part of Mulva’s strategy to build the company into a major force in the industry.

“Alaska is a very important core area for Phillips, and it will continue to be a core area for ConocoPhillips,’’ said spokeswoman Kristi DeJarlais.

Conoco has GTL plant

Current Phillips geologists in Alaska may get some help from old exploration data in Conoco’s vaults. But a bigger asset for the North Slope may be Conoco’s gas-to-liquids technology.

Conoco is working on a $75 million GTL demonstration plant at its Ponca City, Okla., refinery that’s a bit larger (400 barrels a day versus 300) than the pilot plant BP is building at Nikiski. Earlier this month, Conoco said it had installed the first of 58 production modules at the plant, scheduled to begin operations by the end of the year.

Conoco plans to start construction of a commercial-size GTL plant in 2004, though its location and size haven’t been decided yet.





Want to know more?

Petroleum News Alaska

If you’d like to read more about ConocoPhillips, as well as Conoco and its Mackenzie Delta investments and the company’s original departure from Alaska, go to Petroleum News • Alaska’s web site at http://www.PetroleumNewsAlaska.com/ and search for these articles:

• March 3 ConocoPhillips senior management positions announced

• March 3 Phillips replaces 135 percent of production; Conoco boosts reserves

• Feb. 3 Conoco net slides 77 percent for quarter; rising production offset by lower prices

• Feb. 3 Phillips profits drop with energy prices; production matches 2000 quarter

• Jan. 20 Too early to declare winners and losers in Arctic gas development

• Jan. 20 FTC wants more on Phillips-Conoco merger; analysts say TotalFinaElf spoiled bid unlikely

• Jan. 13 Mackenzie Valley gas pipeline takes big leap forward

• Dec. 2 Fall in gas prices brings reality to Arctic gas

• Nov. 25 Alaska will continue to be major asset in combined company

• Nov. 25 Conoco, Phillips merge as equals

• Nov. 25 Phillips, Conoco union a plus for Arctic gas development

• Nov. 18 Older is better in Canada, say U.S.-based

• Nov. 11 Don’t forget Canada’s Arctic oil, says consulting geologist

• Oct. 28 Mackenzie Delta gas could be destined for Alberta oil sands

• Oct. 21 Mackenzie Delta producers, aboriginals ink pipeline agreement

• August issue (when PNA was a monthly) Pipeline transportation costs major issue for Conoco in Alaska

• August issue Conoco boss fights for development of Mackenzie Delta gas

June 2001 Conoco’s C$9.8 billion offer for Gulf Canada jolts Calgary boardrooms

Note: If you are interested in reading about Milne Point, a former asset of Conoco’s in Alaska, search for “Milne” in the archives. There is an occasional mention of Conoco in other stories as well. (You must be a paid subscriber to PNA to access the archives.)


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
[email protected] --- http://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.