NOW READ OUR ARTICLES IN 40 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES.
HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter Magazines Advertising READ THE BAKKEN NEWS ARCHIVE! BAKKEN EVENTS PETROLEUM MINING

SEARCH our ARCHIVE of over 14,000 articles
Vol. 19, No. 8 Week of February 23, 2014
Providing coverage of Bakken oil and gas

A year of records

2013 saw ups and downs in ND production with weather calling the shots

Mike Ellerd

Petroleum News Bakken

It’s hard to talk about North Dakota oil production these days without talking about setting records, and December production was no exception. But the record is not of the type people are used to seeing as a decline in output in December marks the largest single drop in average daily production in the state’s history.

In November, North Dakota’s daily oil production averaged 976,453 barrels per day, a record high, but by the end of December, preliminary production data indicate the state’s daily oil production averaged 923,227 bpd, a drop in production of 53,226 bpd (see chart).

But the drop in December’s production came as no surprise to Lynn Helms, director of the North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources, the agency that regulates and monitors oil and gas production in the state. Following several months of tepid increases, the state’s production saw a sharp boost of 30,995 bpd in November, which was a month of moderate weather.

However, by the time the November production data were compiled and released on Jan. 14 Helms knew December was a month of rough weather in North Dakota. In a Jan. 14 press conference discussing the November production data Helms said “If you recall, we’ve been talking about the fact that November was a very nice month — we had nice warm weather, dry weather — and we expected a significant surge in production, and we got it after having a fairly low production increase in October,” but then added “December isn’t going to be so nice.” Truer words were never spoken.

“Really the big story in December was the weather,” Helms said in a Feb. 14 monthly press conference. “We had a significant number of days where we saw 21 to 31 degrees below zero Fahrenheit. We had four big snow events across the northern and central part of the state. We had five big wind events.”

Freezing fracks

The most significant impact of weather in December was on hydraulic fracturing. Helms said that at temperatures in the minus 20 to minus 30 degree Fahrenheit range, fresh water used in fracking freezes during frack operations. Helms said some companies have been experimenting with saltwater, but added that at minus 31 degrees Fahrenheit, even salt water freezes. “So they just simply can’t pump hydraulic fracturing jobs when you have 21 and 31 degrees below zero. So that’s the major impact of the cold.”

And with the pace of fracturing slowing significantly due to weather, the backlog of wells awaiting completion increased accordingly with 635 wells now waiting to be completed, an increase of 125 in the last month. And at this point in the winter, Helms said it could be spring before progress is made on that backlog. “That leaves us with an enormous inventory of wells waiting for fracturing,” he said. “So we just have this big, big overhang waiting for hydraulic fracturing and that catch-up may not really come until spring thaw and until load restrictions come off.”

Snow and wind

The heavy snow events interfered with the transport of materials used for drilling and completing wells as well as with the transport of oil from wellsites. “Every day there’s casing and cement and frack sand and water, oil and salt water moving around out there in the 17 oil and gas producing counties, and so the snow really impacts that,” Helms said, adding only 154 wells were spudded in North Dakota in December, the lowest since February 2012.

The strong wind events caused problems with workover rigs setup to complete wells “and they just simply can’t work when the wind is blowing more than about 35 or 40 miles an hour,” Helms said and added that there were five days in December when workover rigs couldn’t be moved to prepare wells for fracturing due to the wind.

“So the weather really was the big news behind December,” Helms said. “It’s just one Alberta Clipper after another.”

A year of record ups and downs

North Dakota’s second largest production decline also occurred in 2013 when output in January fell to 739,086 bpd, a decline of 29,824 bpd from the December 2012 output of 768,910, a 3.9 percent decline. That production drop was due largely to winter storm Gandolf that hit the state in early January and a sub-zero cold snap that hit in late January.

In a year of records, North Dakota also saw its largest monthly production increase in 2013 when output jumped by 50,758 bpd in July following a wet spring and extensive load limit restrictions, an increase of 6.2 percent.

The second largest production increase was in February 2013 when production jumped 42,270 bpd over January to 781,356 bpd. While there was some cold weather in February, it was generally a month of moderate winter weather.

It all goes to show that even with all of the technological advances that have made North Dakota the second largest oil producing state in the U.S. behind Texas, Mother Nature may ultimately have the final say on just how much oil comes out of the ground in North Dakota in any given month.

The December numbers

The adverse weather was also reflected in a number of production statistics, including the average number of days from spudding to initial production for North Dakota wells, which increased by 18 days in December to 132.

The rig count did increase a bit in December standing at 190 compared 184 in November, but at the same time the number of wells completed fell from 138 to 119.

Natural gas production dropped even more than oil production in December averaging 991 million cubic feet per day, a 9.1 percent decline from the 1.09 billion cubic feet produced per day in November. Flaring increased considerably in December rising 6 percent back up to the all-time high of 36 percent (see story on page 1).

In December, there were 10,015 wells producing in North Dakota, down slightly from 10,042 that were producing in November. Of those 10,015 wells, 6,803 or 68 percent are unconventional wells producing from the Bakken and Three Forks formations with the remaining 3,212, 32 percent, legacy conventional pool wells. Of North Dakota’s 923,227 bpd output in December, 862,978 bpd, 93 percent, came from the Bakken and Three Forks formations. The remaining 60,249 bpd or 7 percent was legacy production. Consequently, 68 percent of the state’s oil wells accounted for 93 percent of the state’s output in December.

Even though North Dakota began and ended 2013 with monthly production declines, the net average daily production increased by 184,141 bpd for the year.



Did you find this article interesting?
Tweet it
TwitThis
Digg it
Digg
Print this story |
Email it to an associate.

Click here to subscribe to Petroleum News for as low as $69 per year.


Petroleum News Bakken - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
[email protected] --- http://www.petroleumnewsbakken.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News Bakken)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.




A bit of North Dakota oil production history

While North Dakota experienced both its largest and second largest declines in average daily oil production in 2013 (see story on page 1), large monthly production fluctuations are nothing new to the state. The state’s third largest decline in average daily production dates all the way back to September 1965 when output fell by 22,397 bpd to 54,174 bpd from the 76,571 bpd the state produced in August 1965.

In addition, there were numerous instances dating back to the mid-1950s when production declines were recorded in the range of 10,000 to 18,000 bpd per month. Likewise, there are numerous instances of similar production increases. However, because the average daily production in the earlier years of Williston Basin development was far less than what is seen today, those fluctuations early in the history of North Dakota’s oil production constituted a much larger percentage of the average output than today.

For example, during North Dakota’s first oil boom, production between August and September 1958 dropped by 18,314 bpd from 45,248 bpd to 26,934 bpd, a 40 percent decline. Then, two months later production in November 1958 increased 81 percent from 23,433 to 42,345 bpd. In contrast, the record-breaking production drop of 53,226 in December of 2013 represents a decrease of only 5.5 percent.

A few other historic North Dakota production statistics are worth mentioning. Since the state’s first oil well went on production in April 1951, North Dakota has produced a cumulative total of 2.58 billion barrels of oil through December 2013. Of those 2.58 billion barrels, 1.1 billion or 43 percent were produced in the 10-year period from 2004 through 2013, and at 35 percent, over one-third or 903 million barrels have been produced in the five-year period since 2009.

—Mike Ellerd