NOW READ OUR ARTICLES IN 40 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES.
HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PAY HERE

SEARCH our ARCHIVE of over 14,000 articles
Vol. 17, No. 31 Week of July 29, 2012
Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry

Still in holding pattern

Shell waits for ice to clear, needs barge certification and air permit decision

Alan Bailey

Petroleum News

Shell’s drilling program remains in a holding pattern, with the drilling fleet at Dutch Harbor, while the company waits for the sea ice to clear from the area of its planned drilling site in the Chukchi Sea.

“Sea ice still lingers over our prospects and the earliest entry still appears to be the first week in August,” Shell spokesman Curtis Smith told Petroleum News in a July 25 email.

Drilling permits

Shell also still needs drilling permits from the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. The issue of those permits will require Coast Guard certification of the Arctic Challenger, the oil containment barge that Shell plans to station in the Arctic as part of its oil spill contingency arrangements.

“We are making good progress on the containment barge and working closely with the Coast Guard to present final construction projects for sign-off as they are completed,” Smith said.

And the Environmental Protection Agency has yet to intimate its position on Shell’s request to change the air quality permit for the Noble Discoverer, the drillship that Shell plans to use in the Chukchi Sea. Shell has also requested changes to the air permit for the Kulluk, the floating drilling platform that the company wants to use for its Beaufort Sea drilling. However, under the terms of the Kulluk permit, Shell can use the rig while EPA reviews the change request.

Shell had been planning to drill up to two wells in the Beaufort Sea and up to three wells in the Chukchi Sea during this year’s Arctic open water season. The delayed start to the drilling will likely result in the completion of fewer wells than the company had intended, Smith told Petroleum News July 26. However, the company will probably drill some top holes at some drilling locations, to achieve a head start on drilling in 2013, Smith said.

Challenger certification

In a couple of recent emails to Petroleum News Cmdr. Christopher O’Neil of the U.S. Coast Guard has explained the situation regarding the certification of the Arctic Challenger, characterized by O’Neil as “a unique vessel.”

In December, the Coast Guard had accepted a proposal by Shell to certify the barge under the standard for a floating production installation. But in early July, Shell, saying that the barge could not meet that standard, proposed to the Coast Guard that the certification should instead be done under the standard for an offshore mobile drilling unit. Certification is required because of significant modifications to the barge as a consequence of retrofitting the new containment system.

The U.S. Coast Guard has accepted Shell’s proposal for the change in the certification standard, O’Neil said.

“The Coast Guard accepted this proposal on July 13, 2012, and requested Shell provide calculations demonstrating compliance with that standard,” O’Neil wrote in a July 25 email. “The Coast Guard is still awaiting data it requested from Shell.”

And with construction on the vessel not yet complete, the Coast Guard cannot yet certify the vessel for safe operation, O’Neil wrote in an email on July 20.

“Major safety and operational systems are still being installed, tested and certified, and required tests such as an inclining experiment have not yet been performed by the shipyard,” O’Neil wrote. “As construction items and plans are completed by Shell and the shipyard, the Coast Guard and ABS (the American Bureau of Shipping) have inspectors standing by to review and inspect them.”

Safety systems

O’Neil said that major safety systems such as the primary and emergency power; and fire detection and extinguishing systems have not yet been completed. Coast Guard inspectors have been working closely with the shipyard — for certification the Coast Guard must confirm that the vessel provides for the safety of crew and workers on board in the conditions anticipated in the area of operations.

O’Neil explained that the originally proposed floating production installation certification requires the vessel to have an anchoring system capable of handling a 100-year storm, on the assumption that the fixed structure would not be able to move out of a storm’s path. The mobile offshore drilling unit certification, for a vessel able to move out of the way of a storm if necessary, only needs a mooring design to cope with a 10-year storm.

However, although the American Bureau of Shipping, the organization setting the certification standards, has said that it will apply the 10-year storm criterion to the Arctic Challenger, bearing in mind that the vessel would not be fixed in one location, the bureau will require minimum environmental standards for the vessel, as would be required for a fixed facility, O’Neil said.



Click here to subscribe to Petroleum News for as low as $89 per year.
Notice: Only paid subscribers have access to the pdf version of this story, which carries maps and other art.

Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469
[email protected] --- https://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E




Protests mount over Shell drilling

Shell’s multi-year efforts to move forward in its Arctic offshore drilling program have been plagued by a series of court cases in which environmental groups have tried to block the permitting of Shell’s activities. But, with the start of drilling now appearing imminent, protestors have taken to the streets, expressing their views in a more visible and vociferous manner.

“In Barrow and Point Hope, Alaska, people who care about the future of America’s Arctic raised a symbolic paddle or joined in a prayer for the ocean to show the Obama administration that they will continue to defend the integrity of the Arctic Ocean from drilling,” said the Alaska Wilderness League in a July 12 press release. “Across the country, concerned citizens from Honolulu, Hawaii to Gloucester, Massachusetts gathered in symbolic expressions of solidarity.”

“Shell’s plans to drill for oil in America’s Arctic waters threaten a way of life in the Arctic that has thrived for thousands of years,” said Rosemary Ahtuangaruak, tribal liaison for Alaska Wilderness League, in Barrow on that same day. “I’m here today to show President Obama and Shell Oil that I will continue to fight for a healthy and intact Arctic for future generations.”

Greenpeace still prominent

The environmental organization Greenpeace has taken a prominent role in the protests. After previously attempting to prevent an icebreaker and the drillship Noble Discoverer from setting out to join Shell’s drilling fleet, in mid-July activists from the organization occupied more than 70 Shell filling stations in the United Kingdom.

Greenpeace has also launched a spoof Shell website, appearing to show Shell as taking a cavalier attitude to the Arctic environment. A Greenpeace video purporting to depict a Shell company meeting in which an attendee is accidentally sprayed with oil spilling from a model oil well went viral on the Internet.

And a Greenpeace vessel, which Greenpeace says is carrying out environmental research using submarines and other equipment, has headed for the area of Shell’s planned Chukchi Sea drilling.

Agencies questioned

On July 13 Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Rep. Doc Hastings sent a letter to Dr. Jane Lubchenkco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and James Watson, director of the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, asking what steps the two government agencies have taken to ensure that Greenpeace activities do not threaten safe operations, disturb marine mammals or interfere with anticipated Native Alaskan subsistence hunting.

“If Sen. Murkowski really cared about protecting Alaska and the environment, she would be focused on stopping Shell’s Arctic drilling operations, instead of cheerleading for Big Oil and trying to block scientific research and peaceful protest,” said Dan Howells, Greenpeace deputy campaign director. “Shell’s drilling program will pollute pristine Arctic air, disturb marine mammals, risk a devastating oil spill that could not be cleaned up, and accelerate climate change. This represents an existential threat to the Arctic ecosystem. A single Greenpeace ship on a research mission does not.” 

Greenpeace Media Officer James Turner told Petroleum News July 25 that Greenpeace’s Chukchi Sea voyage has all authorizations required by law and questioned whether the senators would request that all future Arctic shipping meet the standards they were demanding for Greenpeace.

—Alan Bailey